My knowledge of rhetoric previous to beginning LA101H
consisted of very little. In fact,
it could be boiled down to my distaste for public speaking and formal
debates. I hadn’t considered
anything beyond that to be a “rhetorical situation,” which is probably why I
was so surprised to recognize rhetoric in use this morning amongst some
friends.
Crammed together at a café table, I watched as two of my
closest friends bickered about a popular movie called Pulp Fiction. Is the film a classic or is Quentin
Tarantino just an unoriginal director bent on supposed irony and clichés?
The conversation was lively, if not a little hostile, until
one of them proposed a new idea. “That is only your opinion.” Suddenly, the conversation ceased to
exist. They were done with Quentin
Tarantino and his pop culture references.
That was when I remembered a section from our class reading
about opinions. A harsh comment
about someone’s opinion implies that opinions are not very important. Opinions aren’t facts, and therefore
they don’t matter. Another reason
why my friends were so upset about their contradicting thoughts was because opinions
are often tied to identities and beliefs.
To critique a person’s opinion is to attack their individual beliefs and
values.
So, this instantly became a far more interesting situation
than simply the pros and cons of Pulp Fiction. Why did my friends not want to continue their
conversation? Was it because they
didn’t want to slander each other’s character, which opinions seem to be so
carefully entwined with? Or was it
because they thought their opinions were unimportant?
The truly fascinating part about the whole debacle was the
fact that the “that is only your opinion” line terminated the debate
entirely. Clearly, they both automatically
assumed that opinions cannot be changed and they would not try to do so.
This made me wonder—isn’t the whole point of rhetoric to
persuade and create open discussion?
If so, why is it that we are so intent on being correct, and
why are we so terrified that our thoughts and ideas will hurt everyone we talk
to?
Maybe rhetoric is more complex that I originally gave it
credit for . . .
I'm definitely stoked that I'm not the only person who blogged about opinions and rhetoric. Totally agree with you 100%!
ReplyDeleteToo many people today go into debates over topics with a full head of steam, and have no desire to see the other person's opionion or be changed by it. What would happen if we lived in a world where people in debates did listen to each other instead of thinking of their next argument to say?
ReplyDeleteAh, movie debates. Hostility in the air, friendships testing new waters. I can see it now.
ReplyDeleteWhat a perfect place to witness a debate on opinions -- personally, some of my most intense arguments occur over opinions on movies, TV shows, and music.
I agree with you that the conversation wasn't continued because opinions are so closely interwoven with a person's identity. And while we in general are really open to hearing the opinions of others, when it comes down to our favorite movies, TV shows, &c., it can be easy to stand firm and not even budge an inch.